He’s Dead, Jim: Why Common Core Is a Goner and Just Doesn’t Know It Yet by Ze'ev Wurman on June 7, 2015
The underlying message is that Common Core standards are so excellent and unique that states attempting to distance themselves from them won’t do any better.
Yet this message is incorrect, and Common Core is dying. Consider the following. First, the curricula of high achieving nations vary widely. Singapore’s curriculum differs from Japan’s, which in turn differs from Hong Kong’s. Pretending that Common Core succeeded in finding the unique and perfect combination where others failed—and without any evidence of success—is both arrogant and foolish. Further, all serious studies have found Common Core academically mediocre, trailing behind international high achievers in its expectations. As for the proponents’ definition of “alignment,” they consider having the same content but in a different grade as “aligned.” One is forced to conclude that Common Core’s “excellence” exists only in the mind of its peddlers.
But mediocre academics are not the reason for Common Core’s death. Rather, its death comes because states are abandoning its goal of lock-step national uniformity.